• KL Rahul was given out without conclusive evidence by the third umpire.

  • India were 51/4 at lunch on Day 1 of the first Test between Australia and India.

AUS vs IND, 1st Test: Commentators in disbelief as KL Rahul given out in a controversial manner by the third umpire
Controversial dismissal of KL Rahul (PC: X)

The first Test between Australia and India in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25 is underway at the Perth Stadium, with early drama overshadowing the morning session. A controversial third umpire decision to give KL Rahul out caught behind left commentators and fans alike questioning the review process.

The controversial dismissal: KL Rahul’s frustration

The incident took place in the 22nd over of India’s first innings, bowled by Mitchell Starc. On the second delivery, a ball angled across the right-handed Rahul was caught by wicketkeeper Alex Carey. While the on-field umpire gave it not out, Australia reviewed the decision, convinced there was a faint edge.

Upon review, Snicko detected a spike, suggesting contact as the ball passed Rahul. However, the replay only provided a side-on angle, which didn’t conclusively show if the bat had edged the ball or if the noise came from the bat brushing the pad. Despite the absence of a front-on angle to corroborate the evidence, the third umpire overturned the on-field decision, declaring Rahul out for 26 off 74 balls.

Rahul was visibly upset as he walked back, shaking his head in disbelief at the ruling.

Commentators question third umpire’s decision

The decision immediately sparked a debate among commentators. Mark Nicholas, on air, remarked, “I don’t see any conclusive evidence to overturn the on-field decision.” His sentiment was echoed by cricket legends and commentators Wasim Akram and Sanjay Manjrekar, who criticized the lack of thorough evidence supporting the decision.

Manjrekar pointed out the inconsistency in the use of technology, saying, “You need both Snicko and visual evidence from the front-on angle to be 100% certain. In this case, the benefit of doubt should have stayed with the batter.”

Akram added that overturning the on-field call in such situations undermines the standard protocol of relying on “conclusive evidence.”

Also READ: AUS vs IND – Here’s when Rohit Sharma will join Team India for the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25

Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood shine with the new ball

Australia capitalized on the contentious dismissal to tighten their grip on the match. India struggled against the hosts’ fiery pace attack, with Starc andHazlewood wreaking havoc in the first session.

Starc, who had earlier removed Yashasvi Jaiswal, ended the session with figures of 2/10, while Hazlewood matched him, dismissing Devdutt Padikkal and Virat Kohli. At lunch, India found themselves in deep trouble at 51/4, with Rahul’s gritty knock of 26 being the only notable resistance.

India’s batting lineup seemed unsettled by the pace-friendly conditions at the Perth Stadium. The bounce and movement extracted by Starc and Hazlewood tested the technique of the top-order batters.

Also WATCH: Josh Hazlewood perfectly sets up Virat Kohli’s wicket on Day 1 of the AUS vs IND Perth Test

 

Subscribe to Cricket Times on YouTube to watch Exclusive Interviews, Podcasts, Weekly News Updates & Explainers.

TAGS:

CATEGORY: Featured India KL Rahul Test

For latest cricket news and updates, subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter.

About the Author:
Anirudh is the Head of Content at CricketTimes.com. He is a seasoned journalist and content writer with 12 years of experience in the field of cricket. With over 9,000 published articles under his belt, Anirudh brings a creative and strategic approach to his work, always striving to deliver content that resonates with audiences. A die-hard sports fan who loves playing, watching and talking about cricket. Cricket is his Religion & 'Sachin Tendulkar' his GOD. His motto of life is Eat, Sleep, Cricket, REPEAT!! You can write to him at anirudh@crickettimes.com and follow him on Twitter, Facebook & Linkedin.